¨ Liability Risks and Protections in Business
¨ Choice of Entity – Tax /State law Structures
¨ Patents, Trademarks & Proprietary Rights
¨ Contracting for Employees, Subcontractors
¨ Product, Sales and Finance Arrangements
¨ Nonprofit Corps – Organization, Tax Status
By Robert A. Adelson, Esq.
EXAMPLE (Hypothetical and Fictitious)
FREEDOM TRAIL TECHNOLOGIES – ENTITY CHOICE /OTHER ISSUES
FREEDOM TRAIL TECHNOLOGIES
Waltham, MA
Founded 2008
Founders Financials
Paid in
P. Revere, d, Pres 10,000 P/L (FY 09 -Projected)*
J. Adams, d, VP/Sec 10,000 Revenue 500 Expenses 500
H. Knox, d,Treas 10,000 Balance Sheet (12/31/09)*
J. Hancock, director [10,000] Assets Liabilities
P. Henry – employee A/R, Equip, A/P, Loans – 275
F. Marion – employee Cash, Other Shareholders
T. Paine – employee Equity 40
Total – 8 – 6 employees 300 Accum Deficit (15)
2 contractors (*,ooo omitted)
Freedom Trail Technologies was founded in 2008 by techies P. Revere, J. Adams, and H. Knox, three former employees of giant Bay Colony Scientific Inc. Each contributed cash, equipment and know-how, and Knox also advanced additional funds as needed to fund the company. So far, most of revenues come from consulting often work bundled into big projects. The economy hasn’t helped. Lots of work they thought they’d get didn’t come in. They’ve retooled. They’ve lost assignments because they aren’t incorporated and had some collection problems. Most of the clients have been satisfied but there are two problem accounts which raise some concern with the founders. Though no suit has been filed, Knox is concerned about protecting his new home “Ft. Knox” in Weston. In any case, the group wants to spend more time developing e-Revolution™ a new product they feel can make an impact in B2B e-commerce.
A colleague of Revere, J. Hancock who led Tea Party Inc. and other successful companies in the past, has likewise expressed desire to see the group spend more time in development and has said he’d like to invest $10,000 to match contributions by the founders. Besides his own willingness to invest, Hancock introduced Revere to A. Hamilton the wealthy managing partner of Below-Zero Stage Investments, a Cambridge-based VC fund. Hancock also suggests meeting M. Gandhi, a US resident with key contacts in Banglapore India (Gandhi, Nehru & Mountbatten). Hancock says she may be helpful raising funds off-shore (and Revere thinks… in providing additional programmers if and as needed.)
In the meantime, Adams has interested G. Washington, CEO of First-In-War Co. a nationally known VAR out of Arlington, VA, in e-Revolution™, so much so that Washington asked for detailed product specifications, information on where it’s been marketed, revenues and prospects to this point. Adams is gathering information to send Washington who just sent his 20-page standard Exclusive License. Revere likes FIWC. It’s marketed other e-products and is well known, so he’s tempted to sign.
Both Adams and Knox have pushed Revere to form a corporation or LLC for financing reasons. He just wants to get the work out. Unfortunately, that’s gotten harder of late since B. Arnold, a valued employee since launch, quit FTT recently and joined the competition. Arnold felt he wasn’t appreciated enough. Meanwhile, other recruits, P. Henry, F. Marion & T. Paine have also asked for equity. Revere particularly doesn’t want to lose Patti or Frances or even vociferous Tom. Time has been short since the move to a bigger space in Waltham. However, the founders have decided it’s time to attend to paper work – to consider some form of business “entity”, whether to sign the VAR contract, whether to get a costly patent of e-Revolution and other “legal stuff”. Time and money are short. What will we recommend?
IS IT REALLY NECESSARY
TO INCORPORATE?
… and Other Questions to help you tell -
Is a Corporation the best choice for me?
¨ What are your motives? What are your goals and objectives in choosing an entity (new entity) under which to conduct business?
¨ Have you lost business because of concern over lack of incorporation, “continuity of existence” or lack of commitment to the enterprise?
¨ Are you selling products or services now? What potential liabilities do you face? Were you sued? What assets do you want to protect?
¨ Does your business have sufficient capital? Have you borrowed? offered loan guarantees? collateral? What are your expected capital needs in the near future? expected capital sources? Is any offshore?
¨ Is your business capital intensive? Does it involve substantial investment in real estate, oil, gas, cattle or other investment assets?
¨ Do you expect to encounter substantial losses? Is immediate pass-through of losses or differential pass-thru to investors important?
¨ Is your business people intensive? Is employee and executive recruitment important? Do you want to offer equity incentives?
¨ Is your business family held? Do you seek to keep in the family ownership? Management? What other family goals are sought?
¨ Are you a life-style company? If not, what is your exit or harvest strategy? Is planning for that important to you now?
¨ Do you have important concerns over timing /fiscal year? Cash basis vs. Accrual accounting? Fringe benefits? Deduction of expenses?
STATE LAW CHOICES OF BUSINESS ENTITY
(MASS. STATE LAW)
Organizational Legal Structures |
Limited Liability |
|
State Filing |
|
State Tax |
|
| 1) Sole Proprietorship |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 2) Partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ►General |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
| ►Limited |
GP— LP√ |
|
√ |
|
No ann Fee after orig filing |
|
| ►Limited Liability Partnership (“LLP”) |
√ |
|
√ |
|
ann.Fee $500/yr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 3) Limited Liability Company (“LLC”) |
√ |
|
√ |
|
ann. Fee $500/yr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 4) Corporation (for Profit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ►Business or Professional |
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
| ►Domestic or Foreign (Del.) |
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
| - ► “C Corporation” |
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
| ► “S Corporation” |
√ |
|
√ |
|
Minimum Frchise Tax
|
ADVANTAGES of Incorporation over
Partnership or Sole Proprietorship
1) Limited Liability (without insurance)
2) Ease of Transfer of Interests & Financing
3) Continuity of Enterprise
1) Complexity and Paperwork
2) Cost
3) Taxes
- exceptions: S Corps and many offsetting issues (see Taxation)
TAXATION OF BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
| Merits of Structure Entity Tax Issues |
C Corp |
|
S Corp |
|
Pship |
|
LLC |
|
|
Yes |
|
Mainly No |
|
No |
|
No |
|
| Profits over $50,000 Profits under $50,000 |
Bad Good |
|
OK OK |
|
OK OK |
|
OK OK |
|
|
Bad |
|
OK |
|
OK |
|
OK |
|
|
Bad |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
| Accum Erngs Tax |
Bad |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
| Pers Holdg Co Tax |
Bad |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
Bad Good |
|
OK OK |
|
Good OK |
|
Good OK |
|
|
Bad |
|
OK |
|
Good |
|
Good |
|
|
OK |
|
OK |
|
OK |
|
OK |
|
|
Good Good |
|
N/A N/A |
|
N/A N/A |
|
N/A N/A |
|
|
Bad |
|
OK |
|
Good |
|
Good |
|
|
OK |
|
Good |
|
Bad |
|
Bad |
|
|
Bad if > $5mil rev |
|
Good |
|
Good |
|
Good |
|
|
Good |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
Good |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND
PROPRIETARY PROTECTION
Patent - Strongest protection for proprietary technology but also hardest to attain
Advantages – Limited Monopoly, covers Ideas, upheld against innocent users, reengineering
Disadvantages – High Threshold to achieve, cost, time, claims may be limited/circumvented. Policing
Copyright - protection for expression, against reproduction of proprietary matter, easier to attain
Advantages – Long Duration, low cost/threshold
Disadvantages – Not protect ideas, only copying, not against independent devlpt or innocent use
Trademark - word or symbol describing product or service protection available with use in commerce
Trade Secret – Broadest subject matter. Protection for business Competitive advantages, easy to gain, difficult to maintain
–Internal security – employee confidentiality
–External security – plant / computer security
–Document control, visitor non-disclosure agmts
CONTRACTS FOR EMPLOYEES AND SUBCONTRACTORS
Employment Agreements – Executives and key Employee contacts
1. Founder and Key Employees, both for loyalty and to secure key human assets
2. Duties, Outside Affiliations, Board Control
3. Salary Compensation, Benefits
4. Confidentiality, New Inventions, Non-compete and restrictive covenants
Employee Manual – Employment terms of other salaried employees
Service Contacts – independent contractor
1. Description of Services, milestones, reports
2. Fees, flat, formula, segment; Expenses
3. Warranties, indemnification, Confidentiality, non-disclosure
4. Independent Contractor status
Cash Compensation and Benefits
Equity Incentives / Participation
Shareholder / Share Purchase Agreements
CONTRACTS FOR PRODUCTS -MANUFACTURE & MARKETING
Production Contracting Arrangements
1. Supply contracts and Purchase Orders – Battle of Forms
2. Payment and Credit Terms
3. Equipment Leasing
4. Service Contracts
5. Manufacturing Arrangements
1. Identification of Company=s market niche,
2. Distributor and Dealer Agreements
a. Territory, Exclusive or Non-Exclusive
b. Sales levels, Pricing, Credit Terms
c. Product, Parts, Supplies, Service
3. Sales Agent / Representative
4. Sales Contract Terms
5. Marketing and Promotional Arrangements
Product Licensing
1. Types: Use, Manufacture, Distribution, Trademarks, Licenses, OEM, VAR, Agreements
2. License Terms
a. Grant, Exclusivity Back Licenses
b. Royalties and Audit Reports
c. Intellectual Property Protection
d. Warranties, Liabilities, Expert Controls
3. Software Licensing Issues
a. Source Code, Object Code, Escrows
b. Shrinkwrap
c. Boxtop licenses, Enhancements
Strategic Technology Alliances and Joint Venture Arrangements
CONTRACTS FOR MONEY:
Raising Capital and Securities Law Compliance
1. Development of Financing Strategy
2. Business Plan
a. Product, Technology, Uniqueness, Edge
b. Market, Competitive Strategy, Penetration
c. Management Team, motivation, track record
d. Financial Forecast, underlying assumptions
e. Capital Sought, financing stage, funds use
3. Valuation – from Company’s pre-money worth
4. Presentation, negotiation, commitment, then Venture Capital Due Diligence
NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS:
PLANNING
Different Purpose of Nonprofit from Business Corporation
Planning for Nonprofit entity
NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS:
ORGANIZATION
Articles of Organization (M.G.L. Ch: 180)
By-Laws
Registration with Division of Public Charities
Annual State Filings
NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS:
TAX EXEMPT STATUS
Application for Federal Tax Exemption
Annual Tax Reports
Application to Mass. Department of Revenue (DOR)
ABOUT THE SPEAKER AND PRESENTATION . . .
These materials were prepared by Robert A. Adelson, Esq., Partner at Engel & Schultz, LLP, 265 Franklin Street, Suite 1801, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, (617) 951-9980, fax: (617) 951-0048. His e-mail addresses radelson@engelschultz.com. Mr. Adelson is a graduate of Boston University, Phi Beta Kappa and Northwestern University Law School in Chicago where he was a member of Law Review. He also has an LL.M. degree in Taxation from New York University and is a member of the Massachusetts, New York and US Tax Court Bars.
Robert Adelson began his legal career in 1977 as an associate at major New York City law firms, first Dewey Ballantine and later Weil Gotshal & Manges, before returning home to Massachusetts in 1985, where he has been a partner at several Boston firms before joining his present firm as senior business law partner in 2000. Mr. Adelson is specialized in corporate, taxation, finance, commercial and technology contracting law. In those areas, he frequently represents startup and smaller companies in software, and other technology-based fields. He also represents executives or consultants in executive compensation and stockholder arrangements, incorporation and liability protection, intellectual property protection, and in vendor, client and subcontractor contracting arrangements.
Mr. Adelson’s law firm, Engel & Schultz, LLP, is a small but broad service law firm of 6 attorneys in Boston. The firm complements Mr. Adelson’s work in business and tax law with seasoned attorneys in family, probate, real estate and litigation matters.
Mr. Adelson is a frequent speaker at business forums. Additional information on the subjects on which he speaks is shown at www.engelschultz.com/index.php/category/publications/ Further information on Mr. Adelson’s background and his past published articles is available at his law firm website www.engelschultz.com/index.php/attorneys/partners/robert-adelson/
The speaker thanks Artem Efremkin, for the invitation to speak to Young Entrepreneurs of Tufts (YET) on the topic of “Business Formation and Early Stage Tax and Legal Issues” at the YET meeting in Medford, Massachusetts, on March 3, 2010.
The examples on page 1 of these Materials are hypothetical and fictitious in their entirety (although the questions on page 2 are drawn from actual client questions). The purpose of the examples and materials, as developed by Robert Adelson, is solely to illustrate planning concepts and stimulate meeting discussion. The purpose of the remainder of these materials is to illustrate and offer rough outlines of broad areas of corporate, tax, contracts and business law which affect choice of business entity and issues in the structure of start-up and early stage businesses including issues of finance, executive and employee recruitment, stock and compensation in high technology and more traditional fields. Thus, it is hoped these materials will be informative to those in attendance. These materials are not legal advice and not intended as any substitute for professional advice or counsel in a particular case.
By Robert A. Adelson, Esq. ©2010. All Rights Reserved.